Re: [ELPA] New package: dict

[Philip Kaludercic]

Eshel Yaron <me@eshelyaron.com> writes:

> Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> writes:
>
>> Would there be a point in implementing the previous, default
>> implementations as functions here that would be invoked, instead of
>> relying using nil?
>
> I'm not sure, I think these default functions wouldn't be very useful on
> their own, so I don't know if it's worth extracting them.  But of course
> we can do it if there's some important benefit I'm missing.

I would imagine that if you wanted to extend the default functionality,
e.g. by binding some variable or whatever one might want, having this
available as a function you can just call, would be useful. 

-- 
Philip Kaludercic