[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0

From: indieterminacy
Subject: Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 14:03:12 +0100

Hi Juh,

juh <juh+emacs-orgmoden@mailbox.org> writes:

> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> Am Sun, Mar 20, 2022 at 08:31:29PM -0400 schrieb John Kitchin:
>> For those who need high fidelity LaTeX export like I do, I think
>> org-ref is still a superior solution. For everyone else, and
>> especially if you do not need sophisticated cross-references and don't
>> want the dependencies of org-ref, org-cite is likely the better
>> solution. 
> Thank you very much for the clarification. 
> I am new to both and I need something that works together with ConTeXt
> export. Currently I am happy with org-cite. I used org-ref before but
> never got good results in ConTeXt export. So I think that I will stick
> wit org-cite. 

I used to use ConTeXt and have a healthy respect for it.
That feedback is good to hear.

> Org-mode is not LaTeX but I wonder if it can be a better replacement for
> my Markdown-->Pandoc-->EPUB/ConTeXt single source publication process.
> Better as I could make more use of org-roam in my writing process.

May I recommend the mininimal Markdown format, GemText?
It has a very simple syntax which is easily convertable into Orgmode

It could be useful for projects where the flow starts with simple
written prose.

> Though I am a long time emacs user putting all these blocks together is
> a challenge, still.
> With your words I now see much much clearer.
> juh


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]