[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] On the impact of installing the next FreeType release on
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] On the impact of installing the next FreeType release on a typical Unix distribution |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:08:33 +0100 (CET) |
> >Sounds good. We should mention in the docs that these steps are
> >performed only *once*, and that we are not going to maintain those
> >hacks.
>
> I think that we'll need to maintain them for quite some time,
> between 6 and 18 months, to ensure that everybody upgrades their
> programs adequately.
With `maintain' I mean that we won't put new developments of FreeType
into it. Of course we should assure that it is still compilable.
> After that, we'll probably disable them by default, but provide a
> "--enable-old-internals" configure option, just in case.
BTW, please add a lot of markers into the `internal' header files,
explaining which data structures and functions must stay unmodified
(w.r.t. size and calling conventions) for backwards compatibility.
Werner
- [ft-devel] On the impact of installing the next FreeType release on a typical Unix distribution, david turner, 2006/02/15
- Re: [ft-devel] On the impact of installing the next FreeType release on a typical Unix distribution, Ilya Konstantinov, 2006/02/15
- Re: [ft-devel] On the impact of installing the next FreeType release on a typical Unix distribution, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/02/15
- Re: [ft-devel] On the impact of installing the next FreeType release on a typical Unix distribution, david turner, 2006/02/16
- Re: [ft-devel] On the impact of installing the next FreeType release on a typical Unix distribution, George Williams, 2006/02/16
- Re: [ft-devel] On the impact of installing the next FreeType release on a typical Unix distribution, david turner, 2006/02/16
- Re: [ft-devel] On the impact of installing the next FreeType release on a typical Unix distribution, George Williams, 2006/02/16