On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 11:50:07AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 11:14:39AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
>>Finally, and most importantly, I think during 2003 it became apparent
>>that GDB's community (as identified by those participating in GDB's
>>development processes - reviewing and contributing patches, engaging in
>>disucssion, testing, ...) was, for the first time, being dominated by
>>non-"Cygnus" players. Assuming this state of play continues, we should
>>finally be able to slay the "Cygnus controls and dominates GDB" dragon.
>
>
>I would say, was being less dominated by "Cygnus" players, ...
I said that I didn't see this as a problem. If you want to pursue it,
for some reason:
More than half of the committed patches for the last year come from Red
Hat employees. Of course, you're single-handedly responsible for that
statistic. Of the top fourteen contributors, that's everyone with more
than twenty committed patches in 2003, almost sixty percent are Red Hat
employees.