[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?

From: Miles Bader
Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?
Date: 19 Sep 2003 13:30:26 +0900

Robert Anderson <address@hidden> writes:
> Two of them take a -L, --log-message option.  tag doesn't.  It
> should, shouldn't it?

I suppose, though it seems less likely that people will use it than
with the others, as the automatic message is usually good enough.

On a related note, I'd like to add a `-s, --summary SUM_TEXT' option to
the import command, like I did for commit (the doubled-text effect of -L
drives me nuts), but import already has a -s option, and I'm not sure
the best thing to do -- change the meaning of `import -s'?  Use another
short option (-S?), but then that's inconsistent with `commit -s' (and
the reason I like -s is because many other commands use `-s' as a short
option for --summary).  Gah...


Run away!  Run away!

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]