[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?

From: Damien Elmes
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 14:44:58 +1000
User-agent: Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.3.50

Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:

> Robert Anderson <address@hidden> writes:
>> Two of them take a -L, --log-message option.  tag doesn't.  It
>> should, shouldn't it?
> I suppose, though it seems less likely that people will use it than
> with the others, as the automatic message is usually good enough.
> On a related note, I'd like to add a `-s, --summary SUM_TEXT' option to
> the import command, like I did for commit (the doubled-text effect of -L
> drives me nuts), but import already has a -s option, and I'm not sure
> the best thing to do -- change the meaning of `import -s'?  Use another
> short option (-S?), but then that's inconsistent with `commit -s' (and
> the reason I like -s is because many other commands use `-s' as a short
> option for --summary).  Gah...

Well, if --setup on import was to be the default, the problem would
go away .. :-) But I don't think Tom's with me on that one.

Damien Elmes

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]