[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [REJECT: address@hidden (default naming convention
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [REJECT: address@hidden (default naming convention changes)
Thu, 06 May 2004 00:02:25 +0200
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux)
Tom Lord <address@hidden> writes:
> > From: Matthieu Moy <address@hidden>
> > Tom Lord <address@hidden> writes:
> > > 2) .o, .a, .so, .core, and .so* do not belong in junk.
> > > Those files can be very, very valuable _and_ difficult or
> > > impossible to reproduce. "junk", meanwhile, is comprised of files
> > > that may be casually deleted.
> > Then, shouldn't they belong to "precious" instead of "unrecognized" ?
> No. "Precious" implies that the files should be _copied_ whenever we
> make a copy of "the good stuff" from a tree. Those files are
> definately not (by default) in that category.
I can understand that, but why should they be "unrecognized" ? I don't
understand why having an object file in my tree should prevent me from
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [REJECT: address@hidden (default naming convention changes), Colin Walters, 2004/05/05