[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] How to support arch on systems with a small PATH_MA
From: |
James Blackwell |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] How to support arch on systems with a small PATH_MAX |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Jul 2004 02:57:41 -0400 |
In lists.arch.users, you wrote:
> address@hidden writes:
>> And while you're at it, I'd actually rather see fslint do *more*. For
>> example, I'd like to see a fslint check against every file that gets
>> added in tla. In other words:
>>
>> $ tla commit
>> tla:
>> New file 'some\\screwy\\file' incompatible on these filesystems:
>
> This sort of thing is entirely project-specific -- I certainly have no
> intention of restricting my projects with DOS filename limitations!
That's why I also suggested a flag to commit anyways, and mentioned it
implied a flag for archives that disabled the check.
> Sounds like a pre-commit hook to me (or at most, perhaps some sort of
> rules-file stored in {arch}).
I figure a pre-commit hook won't be aware which files are adds and
renames without being pretty smart.
What I'm suggesting isn't about stopping anybody from doing anything;
rather, its to make them aware of what they're doing.
--
James Blackwell Try something fun: For the next 24 hours, give
Smile more! each person you meet a compliment!
GnuPG (ID 06357400) AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D 247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400
Fw: [Gnu-arch-users] How to support arch on systems with a small PATH_MAX [WAS: arch o n windows?], chth, 2004/07/15
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: How to support arch on systems with a small PATH_MAX, Aaron Bentley, 2004/07/15
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: How to support arch on systems with a small PATH_MAX, Miles Bader, 2004/07/15
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: How to support arch on systems with a small PATH_MAX, Aaron Bentley, 2004/07/15
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: How to support arch on systems with a small PATH_MAX, Miles Bader, 2004/07/15
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: How to support arch on systems with a small PATH_MAX, Johannes Berg, 2004/07/16