[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Features command for arch
From: |
tomas |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Features command for arch |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Sep 2004 09:20:35 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.3i |
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 10:56:43AM -0700, Tom Lord wrote:
>
> > From: address@hidden
>
[...]
> I like the word "introspection" here. That *is* (i agree) the key
> thing.
[...]
> We have some rough ideas so far such as:
>
> ~ sub-command CLIs change over time [...]
> ~ there's lots of "weird branches" of `tla' running, [...]
[...]
> That second point underscores for me the need for standards (I'm
> working on it, actively but slowly). But about "features".....
OK.
> I'm still a little vague on what they are. I guess the related
> question is "What does it *mean* for a `feature' to be present (or
> absent)'?" from which maybe we can figure out how to name features and
> how to implement `tla features'.
> > [``provide'']
>
> That is close to a design trap you are falling into there.
>
> You can see some nice (rough) analogy to another system, so you posit
> the (underspecified) existence of some feature based on that analogy,
> then show how it would be fun to have, then convince everyone to go
> off and implement it.
Darn! You caught me! ;-)
> (I'm not accusing *you* of going overboard
> .... I'm just pointing out a trap that is easy for anyone to fall
> into.)
No, but maybe causing others to go overboard (half-kidding)
> The problem: nowhere in that process, between you thinking of the
> analogy and you convincing everyone to work on something, did you
> actually "validate" the analogy. Possibly the analogy makes no
> logical sense and everybody's work will be wasted.
>
> What does "add (provide 'signed-archives) to tla" actually,
> rigourously, actually *_!_mean_!_*?
Yep. That's the point we'll have to find out.
[Rest elided -- I agree]
Regards
-- tomás
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Features command for arch, tomas, 2004/09/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Features command for arch, Adrian Irving-Beer, 2004/09/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Features command for arch, Tom Lord, 2004/09/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Features command for arch, Stefan Monnier, 2004/09/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Features command for arch, James Blackwell, 2004/09/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Features command for arch, tomas, 2004/09/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Features command for arch, James Blackwell, 2004/09/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Features command for arch, David Allouche, 2004/09/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Features command for arch, Tom Lord, 2004/09/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Features command for arch, David Allouche, 2004/09/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Features command for arch, Tom Lord, 2004/09/02