Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+

[Alfred M. Szmidt]

   > The COPYING file is a copy of the GNU GPL, it doesn't state what
   > the license is of the whole package.  You have to look at each
   > file, and not at the actual license terms to see what the actual
   > terms are of the package.

   Each source file which has a license header asks the reader to
   refer to the src/COPYING file for the license terms of the package
   in this case.

Then Tom needs a good spanking for obfuscating things for no peculiar
reson.