[Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+

[Miles Bader]

"Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden> writes:
> [1]  Equally effective would be to divide COPYING into two parts, the
> first part being labelled "The Purpose of the GNU GPL", and the second
> being labelled "The GNU General Public License", and containing only
> the legally enforceable terms.  But this isn't going to happen either.

Why not?  Have you asked?

-Miles

-- 
`To alcohol!  The cause of, and solution to,
 all of life's problems' --Homer J. Simpson