[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: “GNU software is distributed under the terms of [copyleft] licenses”
From: |
Mark Wielaard |
Subject: |
Re: “GNU software is distributed under the terms of [copyleft] licenses” (was: A GNU “social contract”?) |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Oct 2019 20:17:17 +0200 |
On Sat, 2019-10-26 at 02:35 +0300, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote:
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
> > * GNU licenses uphold user freedom
> >
> > The GNU Project has designed software licenses to ensure developers
> > cannot strip off user freedom from GNU software—“copyleft”
> > licenses. GNU software is distributed under the terms of these
> > licenses.
>
> Sorry, but thatʼs simply untrue. Few GNU software packages are
> under lax, non-copyleft licences, namely: ncurses, nana, speex. And
> there might be a good reason for that [1].
I agree. It would say something like "We prefer to distribute under the
terms of these licenses."
This is also partly why I would recommend trying to merge points 1
(freedom), 2 (uphold freedom) and 4 (beyond software freedom). That
makes it easier to explain what compromises we do and do not make to
uphold user freedom.
Cheers,
Mark
- Re: Turning GNU into a bottom-up organization, (continued)
- Re: Turning GNU into a bottom-up organization, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2019/10/27
- Re: Turning GNU into a bottom-up organization, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2019/10/24
- Re: Turning GNU into a bottom-up organization, Samuel Thibault, 2019/10/24
- Re: Turning GNU into a bottom-up organization, Mark Wielaard, 2019/10/25
- Re: Turning GNU into a bottom-up organization, Samuel Thibault, 2019/10/25
- Re: Turning GNU into a bottom-up organization, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2019/10/27
- Re: Turning GNU into a bottom-up organization, Samuel Thibault, 2019/10/27
- Re: Turning GNU into a bottom-up organization, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2019/10/27
- A GNU “social contract”?, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/10/25
- “GNU software is distributed under the terms of [copyleft] licenses” (was: A GNU “social contract”?), Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/10/25
- Re: “GNU software is distributed under the terms of [copyleft] licenses” (was: A GNU “social contract”?),
Mark Wielaard <=
- Re: “GNU software is distributed under the terms of [copyleft] licenses” (was: A GNU “social contract”?), Carlos O'Donell, 2019/10/27
- Re: “GNU software is distributed under the terms of [copyleft] licenses”, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/10/27
- Re: “GNU cares for computer user freedom beyond software” (was: A GNU “social contract”?), Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/10/25
- Re: “GNU cares for computer user freedom beyond software”, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/10/27
- Re: “GNU welcomes contributions from all and everyone” (was: A GNU “social contract”?), Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/10/25
- Re: “GNU welcomes contributions from all and everyone” (was: A GNU “social contract”?), Mark Wielaard, 2019/10/26
- Re: “GNU welcomes contributions from all and everyone” in context of the proposed “GNU social contract”, Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/10/27
- Re: “GNU welcomes contributions from all and everyone” in context of the proposed “GNU social contract”, Jason Self, 2019/10/28
- Re: “GNU welcomes contributions from all and everyone” in context of the proposed “GNU social contract”, Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/10/28
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: address@hidden is premoderated (was: ML posting issues), Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/10/28