[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: “GNU welcomes contributions from all and everyone” in context of the
From: |
Dmitry Alexandrov |
Subject: |
Re: “GNU welcomes contributions from all and everyone” in context of the proposed “GNU social contract” |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Oct 2019 13:48:09 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Jason Self <jself@gnu.org> wrote:
> Dmitry Alexandrov <321942@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2019-10-26 at 02:45 +0300, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote:
>>>> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
>>>>> * GNU welcomes contributions from all and everyone
>>>>>
>>>>> The GNU Project produces software for anyone to use, but also wants to
>>>>> give everyone the opportunity to contribute
>>>>
>>>> Curious. Prior paragraphs were substantiated by links to extensive
>>>> articles on gnu.org, while this is not. Is that a novelty?
>>>
>>> https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/kind-communication.html
>>
>> Note, that @rms@gnu.org did not mention the main ‘demographic
>> characteristic’ — a class. And perhaps that is not a coincidence: as you
>> know, unlike many other free software developments, major subprojects of GNU
>> [0] are very selective about from whom they are accept contributions.
>> Everyone have to pass though a … bureaucratic process [1], but employees are
>> also have to pass through even longer and humiliating procedures to prove
>> that they are not liars [2].
>
>> [...that is] many are less welcome than some.
>
> Some GNU packages do require copyright assignment to the FSF but anyone is
> able to do so.
Iʼm afraid, your answer does not align well with what you are replying on
(restored above). Is what I said factually wrong?
You prefer to focus on technicalities of document exchange, while that was not
the point of my letter. “GNU welcomes contributions from all and everyone” and
what is under that title implies, first and foremost, not a convenience, but
the absence of _discrimination_ of any kind.
> [0] https://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/fsf-to-begin-accepting-scanned
> -assignments-from-germany
I would like to suggest you how to fix that, but unfortunately your MUA
(Evolution) seems to be so GNOME-ish, that you canʼt disable hardwrapping
without patching it. The only options are either switch to composing HTML-only
messages or to press Ctrl-7 every message you type.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- “GNU software is distributed under the terms of [copyleft] licenses” (was: A GNU “social contract”?), (continued)
- Re: “GNU cares for computer user freedom beyond software” (was: A GNU “social contract”?), Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/10/25
- Re: “GNU cares for computer user freedom beyond software”, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/10/27
- Re: “GNU welcomes contributions from all and everyone” (was: A GNU “social contract”?), Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/10/25
- Re: “GNU welcomes contributions from all and everyone” (was: A GNU “social contract”?), Mark Wielaard, 2019/10/26
- Re: “GNU welcomes contributions from all and everyone” in context of the proposed “GNU social contract”, Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/10/27
- Re: “GNU welcomes contributions from all and everyone” in context of the proposed “GNU social contract”, Jason Self, 2019/10/28
- Re: “GNU welcomes contributions from all and everyone” in context of the proposed “GNU social contract”,
Dmitry Alexandrov <=
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: address@hidden is premoderated (was: ML posting issues), Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/10/28
- Re: address@hidden is premoderated (was: ML posting issues), Carlos O'Donell, 2019/10/28
- Re: address@hidden is premoderated, Florian Weimer, 2019/10/28
- Re: address@hidden is premoderated, Carlos O'Donell, 2019/10/28
- Re: address@hidden is premoderated, Florian Weimer, 2019/10/28
- Re: address@hidden is premoderated, Carlos O'Donell, 2019/10/28
- Re: address@hidden is premoderated, Mark Wielaard, 2019/10/29
- Re: address@hidden is premoderated, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2019/10/31
- Re: address@hidden is premoderated, Florian Weimer, 2019/10/31
- Re: address@hidden is premoderated, Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/10/29