[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GNUnet-developers] gentoo, last tweaks and questions

From: Christian Grothoff
Subject: Re: [GNUnet-developers] gentoo, last tweaks and questions
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 15:23:37 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.6.0

On 04/10/2016 02:04 PM, ng0 wrote:
> Christian Grothoff <address@hidden> writes:
>> This should have been self-fixing if you ran './bootstrap' to generate
>> configure. Next time you see this (kind of) message, just re-run
>> ./bootstrap.
> Hm, I think I need to revisit how this is done by my packages, to
> exclude this behavior which might lead to a 'die' in the build
> process.

Well, 'bootstrap' is only needed if/when building from Subversion. Once
there is a release, this is no longer required.

> Especially on gentoo, where moving gnunet from eapi 5 to the new
> eapi 6 gets hard and needs an entirely new build structure in the
> ebuild file.
>> However, I also should have just pushed the latest manually.
>>  So fixed in SVN 37009.
>> -Christian
> Thanks!
> Would you (or someone else) know if there are tested to be
> unsupported (non functional) plattforms of GNUnet?
> Gentoo can support those to build on:
> alpha
> amd64
> arm
> arm 64
> hppa
> ia64
> mips
> ppc
> ppc64
> sh
> sparc
> x86
> x86-fbsd
> amd64-linux
> ia64-linux
> x86-linux
> It would help for the later testings team to have some input
> which ones to exclude, I can only test a limited set on the
> hardware I have here.

It should work on all of them, even though I don't know what "sh" is and
we've never had a "mips" or "alpha". We do test on amd, arm, ppc, sparc
and x86 (32 and 64-bit).

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]