[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] Still No Luck Accessing Characters From Zapf Dingbats (Or An
Re: [Groff] Still No Luck Accessing Characters From Zapf Dingbats (Or Any Other Strange Font)
Sat, 7 May 2016 12:06:50 +0200 (CEST)
Henry McGilton <address@hidden> wrote:
> I probably sound like a complete dummkopf in this illustrious group, but I
> have tried and
> failed with both Heirloom and regular groff.
ZD does work with Heirloom troff (and with DWB3.3 too), as I did already
wrote in http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/groff/2015-12/msg00003.html.
It does work with default -Tps when loading an e.g. TTF font or it
does work directly with -Tpost:
echo "\f(ZD\N'37'"|troff -Tpost|dpost >/tmp/h.ps
The same with DWB3.3:
echo "\f(ZD\N'37'"|troff|dpost >/tmp/d.ps
Both show the telephone symbol.
> I must add that I maintained the DWB 2.0 suite of tools (including some I
> wrote myself) at
> Sun Microsystems and other venues from around 1984 through about 2007, at
> point Apple decided in their Infinite Wisdom to break most of the DWB 2.0
> suite forever.
> During that time, I had no problems displaying ZD (we had a hack that
> created two fonts
> named Z1 and Z2, so that the characters from 161 through 254 could be
> accessed in
> using 7-bit ASCII character codes).
> So if there is anyone out there who has an actual document that accesses the
> ZD font
> and actually displays the desired result, I would very much appreciate
> seeing such a
As said, Heirloom with -Tpost or DWB3.3 works fine.
BTW: I'm not sure that DWB2.0 is really broken *forever*, the Heirloom source
code is not very different from DWB2.0 ;)
Surely groff works too, I just wanted to correct the statement that traditional
troff would not work.