[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: binary loadable files
From: |
Dirk Herrmann |
Subject: |
Re: binary loadable files |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Jan 2001 16:53:49 +0100 (MET) |
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Keisuke Nishida wrote:
> At Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:12:00 +0100 (MET),
> Dirk Herrmann wrote:
> >
> > > What about `undump'?
> >
> > Since I agree that the read / write naming fits more nicely with the rest
> > of the IO primitives, what about write-dump read-dump? It's more explicit
> > than the suggested write-binary / read-binary, which could mean a lot of
> > things, but still fits better than dump / undump.
>
> Hmm, I guess write-object / read-object might be the best in this sense.
Well, these don't give any indication of their 'binary' nature. So what
about write-object-binary / read-object-binary? A little bit verbose, but
tells really all that is needed.
Best regards,
Dirk Herrmann
Re: binary loadable files, Dale P. Smith, 2001/01/30
Re: binary loadable files, Keisuke Nishida, 2001/01/30