Re: Arch archive setup

[Andreas Rottmann]

Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:

> I think I'm going to side with Rob on this one ;) I guess I'm used to
> having to tell CVS about everything I do. I feel more comfortable with
> this one, if it doesn't bother you too much. But either way. If you have
> a strong preference for taglines, that's ok.
>
No, let's use explicit IDs, then. We should use uuidgen-generated IDs,
not the ones tla generates by default (hint: tla-update-ids from
tla-tools automates tagging, both for tagline and explicit IDs).

>> > However, we can't promise that the GTK 2.6 bindings will be
>> > backwards-compatible with the 2.4 bindings, since things are
>> > still in flux on the gobject level (although they might be
>> > settling down a bit).
>> >
>> So I guess this would mean we probably need to branch before we
>> activly start hacking on GNOME 2.6 features.
>
> Probably right. Jesus, I hope we can get releases out soon.
>
Things have finally started moving wrt g-wrap and I hope the first
g-wrap 1.5 release is not more than a week or two away.

Cheers, Rotty
-- 
Andreas Rottmann         | address@hidden      | address@hidden | address@hidden
http://yi.org/rotty      | GnuPG Key: http://yi.org/rotty/gpg.asc
Fingerprint              | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219  F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62

Packages should build-depend on what they should build-depend.