guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?)


From: Bonface M. K.
Subject: Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?)
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2020 23:49:47 +0300
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)

Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz> writes:

> Just tested, EXWM works with emacs-no-x-toolkit!
>

Just tested it too, and it works for me too :)

> So I suggest we add the following packages:
>
> (define-public emacs-no-x-toolkit-xelb
>    (package
>      (inherit emacs-xelb)
>      (name "emacs-no-x-toolkit-xelb")
>      (arguments
>       (substitute-keyword-arguments (package-arguments emacs-xelb)
>         ((#:emacs emacs) `,emacs-no-x-toolkit)))))
>
> (define-public emacs-no-x-toolkit-exwm         
>    (package
>      (inherit emacs-exwm)
>      (name "emacs-no-x-toolkit-exwm")
>      (synopsis "Emacs X window manager (without X toolkit)")
>      (propagated-inputs
>       `(("emacs-no-x-toolkit-xelb" ,emacs-no-x-toolkit-xelb)))
>      (arguments
>       (substitute-keyword-arguments (package-arguments emacs-exwm)
>         ((#:emacs emacs) `,emacs-no-x-toolkit)))))
>
> Thoughts?

Wouldn't that be redundant? If you wanted to use
EXWM, we already have EXWM provided on MELPA, so
you could just set that up. That's IMHO though.

-- 
Bonface M. K. (https://www.bonfacemunyoki.com)
Chief Emacs Mchochezi / Twitter: @BonfaceKilz
GPG key = D4F09EB110177E03C28E2FE1F5BBAE1E0392253F

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]