[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Release 1.2.1: status
From: |
Luis Felipe |
Subject: |
Re: Release 1.2.1: status |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Mar 2021 22:26:51 +0000 |
Hi zimoun :)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Thursday, March 18, 2021 2:28 PM, zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
> We are still missing a good story to monitor what is archived on
> Software Heritage and what is not. Because for now there is rate limit,
> I am not able to automate… Well, it is a long WIP. :-)
>
> To help and avoid this rate limit, if all of us simply run:
>
> for pkg in $(guix package -I | cut -f1);
> do
> guix lint -c archival $pkg
> done
>
> for all our profiles, it will ensure at least a coverage for the
> packages using git-fetch that we individually care. Note the option
> --manifest for “guix lint” is missing… should happen soon if no one
> beats me. :-)
I tried this with my user profile and the script hit the Software heritage
limit after reporting the status of 33 packages (most of which are not
archived). So, for the rest of the packages, you are asked to try again later
(I have 95 packages in my profile).
Is "guix lint -c archival $pkg" supposed to poke Software Heritage to archive
the $pkg if it is not archived yet? I ask because I ran the script later and I
got the same output from the first run, i.e., packages reported to be missing
from Software Heritage were still reported as such, instead of being planned
for archive.
Also, I got a backtrace when checking icecat:
★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★
gnu/packages/virtualization.scm:1070:5: libvirt@5.8.0: Software Heritage rate
limit reached; try again later
Backtrace:cecat@78.8.0-guix0-preview1 [archival]...
12 (primitive-load "/home/yo/.config/guix/current/bin/guix")
In guix/ui.scm:
2164:12 11 (run-guix-command _ . _)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
1736:10 10 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _)
1731:15 9 (with-exception-handler #<procedure 7f6dc61fc9f0 at ic?> ?)
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
634:9 8 (for-each #<procedure 7f6dc61ab800 at guix/scripts/lin?> ?)
In guix/scripts/lint.scm:
65:4 7 (run-checkers #<package icecat@78.8.0-guix0-preview1 g?> ?)
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
634:9 6 (for-each #<procedure 7f6dbecd3300 at guix/scripts/lin?> ?)
In guix/scripts/lint.scm:
74:21 5 (_ _)
In guix/lint.scm:
1225:4 4 (check-archival _)
1092:2 3 (call-with-networking-fail-safe _ _ _)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
1736:10 2 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _)
1669:16 1 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
1667:16 0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
ice-9/boot-9.scm:1667:16: In procedure raise-exception:
In procedure bv-length: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting
bytevector): #f
★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★
Re: Release 1.2.1: status, Andreas Enge, 2021/03/19
Re: Release 1.2.1: status,
Luis Felipe <=
Re: Release 1.2.1: status, Leo Famulari, 2021/03/20