[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Process for reviewing patches as someone without commit access
From: |
Simon Tournier |
Subject: |
Re: Process for reviewing patches as someone without commit access |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Sep 2023 21:05:20 +0200 |
Hi,
There are only two hard things in Computer Science…
On Thu, 07 Sep 2023 at 09:19, Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org> wrote:
>>> Discussing about idea, would it be possible that the QA infrastructure
>>> automatically send a message to Debbugs for tagging? For example, the
>>> usertag ’qa-ok’ or whatever other meaningful name. :-)
>>
>> +1 for that as well, maybe 'qa-passed'.
…naming and…
> The only concern is that it is maintaining QA information in multiple
> places, the QA service itself, and trying to mirror it to the bug
> tracker...
…cache invalidation. :-)
> QA might fail with a later patch iterations, so it should also then go
> and remove the qa-passed tag? Should it remove the tag when QA is
> currently in an unknown state?
That’s good questions. Yeah, maybe QA could check when starting to
build that there is no ’qa-passed’ or remove it if any.
Cheers,
simon
Re: Process for reviewing patches as someone without commit access, Christopher Baines, 2023/09/27