[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Help-glpk] Re: glpk 4.34 release information
From: |
Meketon, Marc |
Subject: |
RE: [Help-glpk] Re: glpk 4.34 release information |
Date: |
Sat, 6 Dec 2008 09:16:23 -0500 |
Luiz,
I'm not an expert on the compilation flags, so please double check what
I'm trying to say in the following.
The "CFLAGS" set for VS2008 is: /I. /DHAVE_CONFIG_H /nologo /W3
I do not know what the corresponding settings are for MinGW.
It does not appear that any flag for optimization (such as /O2, /GL,
etc.) is turned on for VS2008. I think that a comparison should be made
between the two compilers when both have their optimization for speed
settings adjusted to be as fast as possible.
-Marc
-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On
Behalf Of Luiz M. M. Bettoni
Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2008 8:37 AM
To: address@hidden
Subject: RE: [Help-glpk] Re: glpk 4.34 release information
Hi, Marc.
This topic make me test some models with distinct builds of GLPK:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-glpk/2008-11/msg00026.html
In 2 "good" machines (AMD Athlon64 2.200MHz, 2Gb DDR-400 / Intel Core 2
Duo 2x 2133 MHz, 2Gb DDR2-667), just replacing the glpsol.exe (all
parameters still the same, i'm using all cuts), VS2008 build (from
http://winglpk.sourceforge.net) cannot beat MinGW in all my tests. Off
course, simple models are solved instantaneously, but on some of my huge
problems i can see times like 80s vs 270s, for example.
Maybe we can make a lot of tests and summarize it (using different
machines, some different models from MIPLIB 2003) to be a "pointer" to
users make a choice. Just a pointer, not "the answer to all problems".
Look, maybe a transportation problem in amd processor run faster with
VS2008 build, but a plan scheduling in a intel run better with MinGW
build
(or not?).
Best Regards,
Luiz
Em 6/12/2008 04:11, Meketon, Marc escreveu:
> Luis,
>
> I am curious that your MinGW execution times are so much faster than
> the VS2008 times. Would you know if the various optimization
> parameters are turned on for VS2008?
>
> -Marc
>>
>> I didn't use the VS2008 build 'cause it is much slower then MinGW
>> build. On all my tests with several models in GMPL, the MinGW version
>> take less than a half of VS2008 version time...
_______________________________________________
Help-glpk mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-glpk
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail and any attachments may be confidential or legally privileged. If
you received this message in error or are not the intended recipient, you
should destroy the e-mail message and any attachments or copies, and you are
prohibited from retaining, distributing, disclosing or using any information
contained herein. Please inform us of the erroneous delivery by return e-mail.
Thank you for your cooperation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- [Help-glpk] Re: glpk 4.34 release information, Luiz M. M. Bettoni, 2008/12/05
- Re: [Help-glpk] Re: glpk 4.34 release information, Luiz M. M. Bettoni, 2008/12/06
- RE: [Help-glpk] Re: glpk 4.34 release information, Luiz M. M. Bettoni, 2008/12/06
- RE: [Help-glpk] Re: glpk 4.34 release information,
Meketon, Marc <=
- Re: [Help-glpk] Re: glpk 4.34 release information, Luiz M. M. Bettoni, 2008/12/06
- RE: [Help-glpk] Re: glpk 4.34 release information, Meketon, Marc, 2008/12/06
[Help-glpk] Building glpk for ms windows, Andrew Makhorin, 2008/12/09