[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: design goals vs mechanisms (was: Re: Let's do some coding :-)
From: |
Alfred M\. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: design goals vs mechanisms (was: Re: Let's do some coding :-) |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Oct 2005 14:19:51 +0200 |
> Furthermore, doesn't really explain why GNU/Linux is not
> sufficient.
>
> Because the goal of the GNU project is to create the GNU system,
> which doesn't use Linux as its kernel.
Is it?
Yes, lots of work has been done on the Hurd, it would be silly to
throw that away.
- Re: design goals vs mechanisms, (continued)
- Re: design goals vs mechanisms (was: Re: Let's do some coding :-), Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/27
- Re: design goals vs mechanisms (was: Re: Let's do some coding :-), Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/27
- Re: design goals vs mechanisms (was: Re: Let's do some coding :-), Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/27
- Re: design goals vs mechanisms (was: Re: Let's do some coding :-), Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/27
- Re: design goals vs mechanisms (was: Re: Let's do some coding :-), Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/27
- Re: design goals vs mechanisms (was: Re: Let's do some coding :-), Brian Brunswick, 2005/10/27
- Re: design goals vs mechanisms (was: Re: Let's do some coding :-), Bas Wijnen, 2005/10/27
- Re: design goals vs mechanisms (was: Re: Let's do some coding :-),
Alfred M\. Szmidt <=
- Re: design goals vs mechanisms (was: Re: Let's do some coding :-), Bas Wijnen, 2005/10/27
- Re: design goals vs mechanisms (was: Re: Let's do some coding :-), Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/27
- Re: design goals vs mechanisms (was: Re: Let's do some coding :-), Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/27
RE: Let's do some coding :-), Christopher Nelson, 2005/10/25
RE: Let's do some coding :-), Christopher Nelson, 2005/10/25