[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD
From: |
Edd Barrett |
Subject: |
Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Oct 2018 10:36:34 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 01:31:55PM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> Log follows, from your branch and libcdio-paranoia master:
>
> cdparanoia III release 10.2 libcdio 2.0.0 x86_64-unknown-netbsd7.1
> (C) 2001 Monty <address@hidden> and Xiphophorus
> (C) 2004, 2005, 2008 Rocky Bernstein <address@hidden>
> (C) 2014 Robert Kausch <address@hidden>
>
> Report bugs to address@hidden
>
> ++ WARN: ioctl CDIOREADMSADDR failed: Invalid argument
>
> SCIOCCOMMAND cmd 0xbe sts 3
> SCIOCCOMMAND cmd 0xbe sts 3
> SCIOCCOMMAND cmd 0xbe sts 3
> SCIOCCOMMAND cmd 0xbe sts 3
> SCIOCCOMMAND cmd 0xbe sts 3
> SCIOCCOMMAND cmd 0xbe sts 3
> SCIOCCOMMAND cmd 0xbe sts 3
> SCIOCCOMMAND cmd 0xbe sts 3
> SCIOCCOMMAND cmd 0xbe sts 3
> 010: Unable to access sector 169348352: skipping...
> 405: Option not supported by drive
> 401: Invalid track number 255
> Selected span contains non audio track at track 19. Aborting.
This is troubling.
The 0xbe messages I think are to do with setting the volume.
The other warnings suggest that some kind of addressing mechanism is
busted?
Can you try backing out:
https://github.com/vext01/libcdio/commit/3826afab31d4d418be3f0fee1132fa61077000f5
Does that help?
--
Best Regards
Edd Barrett
http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk
- [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Greg Troxel, 2018/10/13
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Edd Barrett, 2018/10/13
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Greg Troxel, 2018/10/25
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Rocky Bernstein, 2018/10/25
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Rocky Bernstein, 2018/10/26
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Edd Barrett, 2018/10/26
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Greg Troxel, 2018/10/26
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Greg Troxel, 2018/10/26
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD,
Edd Barrett <=
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/10/29
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Edd Barrett, 2018/10/29
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/10/29
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Edd Barrett, 2018/10/29
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Edd Barrett, 2018/10/29
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/10/29
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/10/29
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/10/30
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Edd Barrett, 2018/10/30
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Rocky Bernstein, 2018/10/30