[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?
From: |
Christian Grothoff |
Subject: |
Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support? |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Oct 2013 19:30:57 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130922 Icedove/17.0.9 |
This does sound reasonable to me, and if that approach allows us to
get rid of plibc and make everyone happy, I'm fine with it. However,
I won't do this myself as I don't do W32 development and thus could
not reasonably test this. I would also ask that any patch provided
to do this should be run by LRN and/or Nils just to make sure we don't
have unexpected regressions.
Happy hacking!
Christian
On 10/16/2013 05:50 PM, Luke-Jr wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 1:19:09 PM Evgeny Grin wrote:
>> Win32 sockets itself are mostly compatible.
>> But 'select' on win32 can be used only on sockets, while MHD use it for
>> pipes too,
>
> I use sockets in place of pipes to workaround this:
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/bfgminer.git/tree/util.c#n2626
>
> Luke
>
- [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?, Luke-Jr, 2013/10/14
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?, Luke-Jr, 2013/10/14
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?, Evgeny Grin, 2013/10/16
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?, Luke-Jr, 2013/10/16
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?,
Christian Grothoff <=
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?, Nils Durner, 2013/10/23
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?, Christian Grothoff, 2013/10/23
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?, Nils Durner, 2013/10/23
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?, Luke-Jr, 2013/10/23
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?, Nils Durner, 2013/10/23
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?, LRN, 2013/10/23
Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?, Nils Durner, 2013/10/14