[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?
From: |
Christian Grothoff |
Subject: |
Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support? |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Oct 2013 19:53:46 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130922 Icedove/17.0.9 |
On 10/23/2013 07:50 PM, Nils Durner wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> as the PlibC implementation of select() does more than just interleave
> between Windows' select() and pipe polling, I don't see how "getting
> rid of plibc" would actually make sense (other than to please the
> masses ;-)).
Ok, what else does it do that is relevant for libmicrohttpd? Can you
elaborate?
> OTOH, using a socket instead of a pipe does make sense (because
> aforementioned interleaving would not take place anymore). I had
> planned to hack on this (and 64-bit safety as pointed out by Evgeny)
> already, but Ubuntu distupgrade mayhem got in my way.
Well, as I said, fine with me ;-).
Happy hacking!
Christian
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?, (continued)
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?, Luke-Jr, 2013/10/14
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?, Evgeny Grin, 2013/10/16
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?, Luke-Jr, 2013/10/16
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?, Christian Grothoff, 2013/10/23
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?, Nils Durner, 2013/10/23
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?,
Christian Grothoff <=
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?, Nils Durner, 2013/10/23
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?, Luke-Jr, 2013/10/23
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?, Nils Durner, 2013/10/23
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?, LRN, 2013/10/23
Re: [libmicrohttpd] Real Windows support?, Nils Durner, 2013/10/14