[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: NR 1.5 and 1.6 reviewed

From: Patrick McCarty
Subject: Re: NR 1.5 and 1.6 reviewed
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 00:41:37 -0700
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 09:14:25AM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> 2008/10/2 Andrew Hawryluk <address@hidden>:
> > In the third musical example under "Instrument names" (.itely lines
> > 963–977), why is "Flute" not centered above "Clarinetti / in B(flat)"?
> I don't know.

lilypond-book uses a custom paper block, and this upsets the default
formatting of this example.  Perhaps I should add a note about this?

> > line 1037: what is an alist? should it be @code{alist}? does it
> > require more explanation?
> I don't know.

`alist' is short for `association list', which is the term I should
use instead.  I'll fix it.

> > In the cue note examples the sixteenth-note beams are too wide - they
> > almost merge into a single beam. Is this a bug?
> I don't know.

I'm not sure, but I will look into it.

> > I changed the unnumberedsubsubsec "Deeper nested staff groups" to
> > "Nested staff groups" because there is no previous nesting to be
> > deeper than. (That was an ugly sentence.) However, if changing the
> > document outline was outside the scope of my assignment you may revert
> > the change.

That sounds great.  Thanks for your review, Andrew.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]