[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NR 1.5 and 1.6 reviewed
From: |
Patrick McCarty |
Subject: |
Re: NR 1.5 and 1.6 reviewed |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Oct 2008 00:41:37 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 09:14:25AM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> 2008/10/2 Andrew Hawryluk <address@hidden>:
> > In the third musical example under "Instrument names" (.itely lines
> > 963–977), why is "Flute" not centered above "Clarinetti / in B(flat)"?
>
> I don't know.
lilypond-book uses a custom paper block, and this upsets the default
formatting of this example. Perhaps I should add a note about this?
> > line 1037: what is an alist? should it be @code{alist}? does it
> > require more explanation?
>
> I don't know.
`alist' is short for `association list', which is the term I should
use instead. I'll fix it.
> > In the cue note examples the sixteenth-note beams are too wide - they
> > almost merge into a single beam. Is this a bug?
>
> I don't know.
I'm not sure, but I will look into it.
> > I changed the unnumberedsubsubsec "Deeper nested staff groups" to
> > "Nested staff groups" because there is no previous nesting to be
> > deeper than. (That was an ugly sentence.) However, if changing the
> > document outline was outside the scope of my assignment you may revert
> > the change.
That sounds great. Thanks for your review, Andrew.
-Patrick