[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CG Information on Snippet Handling
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: CG Information on Snippet Handling |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Apr 2009 11:43:29 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 11:55:31PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote:
> Another option (though still not ideal since it suffers from the same
> formatting issues as pasting snippets verbatim from input/new ->
> input/lsr) is to use the same name for the regtest as the new snippet,
> then the docs will automatically pick up the regtest version if
> there's no input/lsr version.
No no no. We used to do this, but it's a bad idea. The
requirements of documentation and regression testing are
difference, but if you tie them together (even temporarily) then
you're always tempted to make the regtest more documentation-ish.
I want to keep a hard wall between these two areas.
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: CG Information on Snippet Handling, (continued)
- Re: CG Information on Snippet Handling, Graham Percival, 2009/04/19
- Re: CG Information on Snippet Handling, Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/04/19
- Re: CG Information on Snippet Handling, John Mandereau, 2009/04/20
- Re: CG Information on Snippet Handling, John Mandereau, 2009/04/24
- Re: CG Information on Snippet Handling, Graham Percival, 2009/04/24
- Re: CG Information on Snippet Handling, Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/04/24
- Re: CG Information on Snippet Handling, Graham Percival, 2009/04/24
- Re: CG Information on Snippet Handling, John Mandereau, 2009/04/24
- Re: CG Information on Snippet Handling, Anthony W. Youngman, 2009/04/24
- Re: CG Information on Snippet Handling, John Mandereau, 2009/04/24
Re: CG Information on Snippet Handling,
Graham Percival <=