[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: lilybuntu confusion

From: Carl D. Sorensen
Subject: Re: lilybuntu confusion
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 13:06:50 -0600

On 7/3/09 1:02 PM, "Graham Percival" <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 12:41:32PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
>> Graham Percival wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 10:50:07PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>>> Does this still compile the lilypond examples?  That would take
>>> take much longer than 10-30 seconds.
>> I'm able to copy to different location and compile certain files by
>> themselves as long as they don't require a bunch of @include files.  They
>> compile very quickly this way.  I wonder if it might help to define some
>> new Make targets.  For example "make lilypond-learning.pdf" would only
>> compile the LM, and I would assume save quite a bit of time in compiling
>> over "make doc".
> I was already planning on splitting the docs into
> Documentation/learning, Documentation/notation, etc., so that
> would implicitly do this anyway.  :)

I thought you were planning on making it


(i.e, eliminating the D).


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]