[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Autobeaming
From: |
Reinhold Kainhofer |
Subject: |
Re: Autobeaming |
Date: |
Sat, 2 Jan 2010 01:02:04 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.31-16-generic; KDE/4.3.4; i686; ; ) |
Am Samstag, 2. Januar 2010 00:35:16 schrieb Carl Sorensen:
> On 1/1/10 10:27 AM, "David Kastrup" <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> writes:
> >> OK, point taken. I'll come up with a different name for the music
> >> function. Do you have any suggestions?
> >>
> >> How about \pushTimeSignatureSetting and \popTimeSignatureSetting?
> >
> > Since we can have a push without a pop, that makes a somewhat
> > uncomfortable pairing.
>
> Why is this more uncomfortable than override without a revert?
Please don't use push/pop. These are computer science terms for queues, not
terms any non-programmer would ever use or understand (to be honest, even I
have to think twice which of the two appends to and which removes from the
queue). Override/revert on the other hand are also used in colloquial language
and so way easier to understand for non-programmers.
Cheers,
Reinhold
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhold Kainhofer, address@hidden, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
* Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria
* http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886
* LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org
Re: Autobeaming, Graham Percival, 2010/01/01
Re: Autobeaming, Carl Sorensen, 2010/01/01