[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Autobeaming
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Autobeaming |
Date: |
Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:40:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.90 (gnu/linux) |
Reinhold Kainhofer <address@hidden> writes:
> Am Samstag, 2. Januar 2010 00:35:16 schrieb Carl Sorensen:
>> On 1/1/10 10:27 AM, "David Kastrup" <address@hidden> wrote:
>> > Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> writes:
>> >> OK, point taken. I'll come up with a different name for the music
>> >> function. Do you have any suggestions?
>> >>
>> >> How about \pushTimeSignatureSetting and \popTimeSignatureSetting?
>> >
>> > Since we can have a push without a pop, that makes a somewhat
>> > uncomfortable pairing.
>>
>> Why is this more uncomfortable than override without a revert?
>
> Please don't use push/pop. These are computer science terms for
> queues,
No, for stacks. And push without pop involves the picture of an
imbalanced stack. It's like ending a book in a story within a story
which ends without going back to the top level. Disconcerting.
And yes, I know Shakespeare's Taming of the Shrew.
--
David Kastrup
Re: Autobeaming, Graham Percival, 2010/01/01
Re: Autobeaming, Carl Sorensen, 2010/01/01