[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: for_UP_and_DOWN

From: Graham Percival
Subject: Re: for_UP_and_DOWN
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 16:44:35 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 05:37:14PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
> > I like that solution, but I'm iffy about relying on compiler
> > support for elements of languages that are less than 10 years old.
> I was not suggesting we use it.  I just pointed out that in future for
> _some_ things "the C++ way" could become less incompatible with
> "readable".


point to you.

- Graham

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]