[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Substitute for s1*0
From: |
Trevor Daniels |
Subject: |
Re: Substitute for s1*0 |
Date: |
Sun, 6 May 2012 16:35:16 +0100 |
David Kastrup wrote Sunday, May 06, 2012 9:34 AM
Quick: tell me what you would expect without too much thinking (imagine
you are a naive user) from the following:
\new Staff <<
\relative c'' { c4 d e f s1*0-\markup Oops c d e f g1 } \\
\relative c' { c4 d e f <>-\markup Wow c d e f g1 }
That's not really a competition, is it?
Well, that's a poor example, as neither form is needed when
there is a string of notes or s's. So this particular issue
doesn't really arise in practice.
Actually, I don't think s1*0 appears in the docs. Might be
in an LSR snippet, I guess. But I've no problem with
documenting <>, as long as a realistic example showing
when it is useful can be found.
Trevor
Re: Substitute for s1*0, David Kastrup, 2012/05/06
- Re: Substitute for s1*0,
Trevor Daniels <=
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, David Kastrup, 2012/05/06
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, Trevor Daniels, 2012/05/06
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, Graham Percival, 2012/05/06
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, David Kastrup, 2012/05/06
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, Trevor Daniels, 2012/05/06
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, Keith OHara, 2012/05/07
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, David Kastrup, 2012/05/07
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, James, 2012/05/07
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, Trevor Daniels, 2012/05/07
- Re: Substitute for s1*0, David Kastrup, 2012/05/07