[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS or not
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS or not |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Jul 2012 11:41:25 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:00:30AM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> Surely an alternative is to have an archive of stable version
> installations?
We have that already:
http://lilypond.org/old-downloads.html
> We could advise users who require that their work
> will compile into the future to ensure it will compile on current
> stable. Then, if they need to recreate it, the just download that
> version.
This is definitely a possibility. Although if that's how we want
the LilyPond project to function, then I think this should be
stated explicitly on the website in a manner similar to
http://lilypond.org/easier-editing.html
I believe in giving people enough information to make an informed
choice. Text input is one "element" (some people would say
"disadvantage") that I made sure that we inform users about before
they download lilypond; an explicit lack of forward compatibility
is another "element" that we should be up-front about, if that's
what we decide.
> @GP - I know this isn't what the question is about, but is there no
> way of rolling back to a version of Lily which will compile your
> files?
Oh, of course I could compile an old version (or just use the GUB
binaries above). There may be some library problems, but in a
pinch I could grab a debian iso from 5 years ago, slap that into
virtualbox, and run with it.
A better solution would be to treat "updating old lilypond scores"
as a hobby -- schedule 1 hour a day, spend one month, and I'd
probably be done. Or at least, it would be updated to 2.14.
Hopefully future updates wouldn't take as long; say, something
like 5 hours a year keeping my scores up-to-date? However, that
thought doesn't fill me with joy and motivation to use lilypond.
I hate doing regular maintenance. I'd rather spend 100 hours
up-front instead of spending 1 hour a year for the rest of my life
(and no, I don't expect to live for another 100 years; I
acknowledge that this is not a rational choice).
- Graham
- GOP2-3 - GLISS or not, Graham Percival, 2012/07/24
- Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS or not, Ian Hulin, 2012/07/24
- Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS or not, Nicolas Sceaux, 2012/07/24
- Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS or not, Andrew Hawryluk, 2012/07/25
- Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS or not, Keith OHara, 2012/07/25