[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics

From: Malte Meyn
Subject: Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2020 12:29:09 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.1

Am 04.01.20 um 11:04 schrieb Peter Toye:
I suggest that \rf (for rinforzando) be added to the built-in dynamic list.

I suggested this on the users list, and got two replies, one fairly positive, 
one negative.

My rationale is that it's accepted as a synonym of rfz, and was used as such by 
both Beethoven (who also used rfz and rinf.) and Brahms. And also by a far 
lesser composer whose work I've just engraved.

As I wrote on the user list, IMO \rf should be added.

But that brings me to another question: Shouldn’t we add the \dynamic command from openlilylib to vanilla LilyPond? This would allow users to have “p dolce”, “più f” and ‘exotic’ dynamics like “mfz” whithout having to define extra commands using make-dynamic-script.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]