[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Does the following Python error in the musicxml tests ring a bell?

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: Does the following Python error in the musicxml tests ring a bell?
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2020 11:05:43 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Jonas Hahnfeld <address@hidden> writes:

> Am Montag, den 02.03.2020, 21:40 +0100 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Jonas Hahnfeld <
>> address@hidden
>> > writes:
>> > Am Montag, den 02.03.2020, 20:10 +0100 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> > > dev/translation-merge
>> > > 
>> > > Fails at make test (at least on my system).
>> > 
>> > Ah, the merge re-instantiated some code for Python 2. The following
>> > diff fixes 'make test' for me:
>> [...]
>> > But very please DO NOT MERGE your branch dev/translation-merge into
>> > master: It will pull in most of the cherry-picked commits from
>> > stable/2.20 which will probably render 'git bisect' useless. Not sure
>> > if that was done for previous releases but it certainly doesn't seem
>> > right for that many commits in stable/2.20 that are not in master.
>> This is a travesty.  I was sure that I checked out every...  every merge
>> conflict outside of Documentation/?? ...
>> Darn.  Those files weren't conflicting.
>> Good that we talked about it.  I'll paste over everything else outside
>> of Documentation/??/ that differs from master still.
>> If the merge commit touches nothing other than that, we should be fine,
>> right?
> Only for the final outcome. 'git bisect' will still walk into (most of)
> stable/2.20 which is likely not what we want it to do. I'll try to have
> a look later today if we can do better.

Darn.  So we'd need to get rid of the history, right?  Can translators
not update from or into current translations branch until we have this
figured out?

Sorry for the inconvenience, seems like I was rushing it too much.

David Kastrup

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]