Re: Accidentals tied over a system break

[Simon Albrecht]

On 08.10.2015 16:38, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> Furthermore, if the tie is removed the sharp on the final fis
> is also removed.  The issue is, without the \break the final fis
> needs the sharp as the second fis doesn't have one, being tied
> to the first fis.  Adding the \break causes the second fis to
> need (and get) a sharp, but the sharp on the third fis, which is
> now redundant, is not removed.  Seems to be a bug to me.

And, just as David said, one that is long known and being tracked: 
<http://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/649/>. There has been 
some discussion, but at any rate it’s nonsense to have both accidentals, 
and IMO the second should be left out.

Yours, Simon