[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [OT] Grammatic gender
From: |
Henning Hraban Ramm |
Subject: |
Re: [OT] Grammatic gender |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Nov 2017 18:45:31 +0100 |
Am 2017-11-18 um 18:33 schrieb David Wright <address@hidden>:
> On Fri 17 Nov 2017 at 17:43:09 (+0000), Wol's lists wrote:
> In English? So when I write "I'm at deathes door", which of deathes
> three genders am I using?
You always use deathes LAST gender. And I’m sure they have more than three.
> It's a pity you weren't around at the time "it's" and "its" were
> invented, to rebuke people who used the former. Or perhaps we could
> just admit that allowing "its" into English was one huge mistake,
> and go back to using "his". Now nobody will have to remember which
> spelling is which. Of course, any child can justify their writing
> "it's". There's an "it", it possesses something, so stick an 's
> on the end. Perhaps Shakespeare had a better reason for writing "it's".
How about "ithes"?
>> (Dialect is not Standard English, if you want to talk dialect that's
>> fine, just accept that it is not standard.)
>
> I see. So Standard English is what you accept, and no more?
> Where do we find this Standard English? Perhaps we need an
> English Language Academy to guard this young language lest it
> be corrupted by its young speakers. We can't trust them.
Standard English is the dialect of Standardshire.
> Not knowing the people or the circumstances, I can't judge. But a
> word of warning: don't ever travel. You might find yourself being
> misunderstood in more serious circumstances, if you don't allow
> for the same words to mean different things, or even the opposite.
No, no: Word *always* mean what I intend them to mean.
And both of my grammars are dead.
EOT
Greetlings, Hraban
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender, (continued)
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender, Kieren MacMillan, 2017/11/17
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender, David Wright, 2017/11/17
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender, Wol's lists, 2017/11/17
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender, Karlin High, 2017/11/17
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender, Kieren MacMillan, 2017/11/17
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender, Peter Chubb, 2017/11/17
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender, J Martin Rushton, 2017/11/17
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender, David Wright, 2017/11/18
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender, Karlin High, 2017/11/18
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender, Wols Lists, 2017/11/18
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender,
Henning Hraban Ramm <=
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender, J Martin Rushton, 2017/11/17
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender, mskala, 2017/11/17
- Re: [OT] Grammatic gender, Henning Hraban Ramm, 2017/11/16
- Re: double time signature problem, Noeck, 2017/11/15
- Re: double time signature problem, David Kastrup, 2017/11/15
- Re: double time signature problem, Karlin High, 2017/11/15
- Re: double time signature problem, Noeck, 2017/11/15
- Re: double time signature problem, Urs Liska, 2017/11/16
Re: double time signature problem, Joshua Stutter, 2017/11/13