[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] inet_chksum.c misbehaving with compiler optimisation?
From: |
Stephen Cleary |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] inet_chksum.c misbehaving with compiler optimisation? |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Nov 2011 19:57:52 +0000 |
I wouldn't rule out the possibility of a timing issue.
We are (currently) running lwIP 1.3.2 with FreeRTOS 4.8.0, on SAM7_GCC
(GCC/ARM7_AT91SAM7S) with EMAC code from lwip_Demo_Rowley_ARM7.
We don't override LWIP_CHKSUM, so the standard (Version #1)
lwip_standard_chksum from inet_chksum.c is the checksum code we use. We
normally compile inet_chksum.c with -O1 (even in debug mode, for code size
reasons), and we don't see the problems you're seeing.
-Steve
- [lwip-users] inet_chksum.c misbehaving with compiler optimisation?, Richard Barry, 2011/11/20
- Re: [lwip-users] inet_chksum.c misbehaving with compiler optimisation?, FreeRTOS Info, 2011/11/23
- Re: [lwip-users] inet_chksum.c misbehaving with compiler optimisation?, Enrico Murador - Research & Development - CET, 2011/11/23
- Re: [lwip-users] inet_chksum.c misbehaving with compiler optimisation?, FreeRTOS Info, 2011/11/23
- [lwip-users] FIXED - Re: inet_chksum.c misbehaving with compiler optimisation?, FreeRTOS Info, 2011/11/23
- Re: [lwip-users] FIXED - Re: inet_chksum.c misbehaving with compiler optimisation?, Kieran Mansley, 2011/11/24