[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Paperclips-discuss] JSP support
From: |
Nic Ferrier |
Subject: |
Re: [Paperclips-discuss] JSP support |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Jul 2001 03:16:57 +0100 |
>>> Brad Cox <address@hidden> 18-Jul-01 2:52:38 AM >>>
For a near-zero overhead alternative to JSP see
http://virtualschool.edu/jwaa. I developed it originally
as an alternative to the core JSP concept, regardless
how implemented. Its grown somewhat beyond that by
now.
Cool!
Is it (L)GPLed?
I'd like to distrib a runtime with Paperclips (maybe with a
--with-jwaa switch on configure) if it is licenced right.
We'll also be shipping BRL with Paperclips - it's available from:
http://brl.sourceforge.net/
It's a scheme based page-mangling language.
I used to use gnujsp too.
My issue with gnujsp is really that it's implemented very badly. I
should point out that I'm being a little unfair, GNUJSP has to do the
really hard job of supporting lots of different containers, many of
them not really containers at all (eg: JServ).
Is paperclips ready for production use? I'm looking to
break free of tomcat too.
Probably not.
I haven't implemented all the DD set yet. Significantly it doesn't
yet:
- construct and map filters (working on it right now)
- configure session environment
- handle init parameters for servlets
- stuff I've probably forgotten
However, it is getting there. I've been running a webserver on my dev
machine with some online articles I'm working on... every now and then
I publish the site ref to a group of people who may be interested in
some of the articles. Paperclips hasn't fallen over yet.
I have recently completly or partially rewritten some of the major
parts of paperclips (HTTP handling and uri matching) and these
re-writes have made things more understandable (and therefore more
stable).
Because of the lacking functionality it's still a toy webapp server.
But do please give it a try!
Nic