Re: [PATCH v5 11/36] tcg/tci: Add TCG_TARGET_CALL_{RET,ARG}_I128

[Richard Henderson]

On 1/27/23 04:00, Alex Bennée wrote:
> > +                for (i = s = 0; i < n; ++i) {
>
> Why the pre-increment for ++i here? It doesn't make a difference surely?

Why not?  It doesn't make a difference.

(Semi-reflexive preference driven by c++, where post-inc operator might (or might not) be 
less efficient, needing to return a copy of the class with the "old" value.  But if you 
don't know, or don't care about the old value, use the pre-inc form.)


r~