[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive
From: |
Guido Draheim |
Subject: |
Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:57:10 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040906 |
Peter Simons wrote:
> Braden McDaniel writes:
>
> >> How about @category?
> >>
> >> Is that an internal field of the archive?
>
> > Not as long as it's in the file I submit to you and the
> > one downloaded by users. "Internal" things are just that:
> > not exposed to users.
>
> So what you are saying is that if I want to have any
> internal keywords in the archive, then I have to distribute
> the m4 files without them, right? I have to keep them
> invisible, as in: they are not in CVS, they are not in the
> release archive, they are not on the website.
>
> Is that correct?
>
They are not in the m4 file but they are in cvs.
Please stop trying to behave stupid - what is
it good for anyway to try?
-- guido
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, (continued)
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Guido Draheim, 2005/01/27
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Peter Simons, 2005/01/27
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Guido Draheim, 2005/01/27
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Peter Simons, 2005/01/27
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Guido Draheim, 2005/01/27
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Braden McDaniel, 2005/01/27
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2005/01/27
- no-meta-data-rewrite is online (was: Versioning Macros In The Archive), Peter Simons, 2005/01/27
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Tom Howard, 2005/01/28
- re-licensing (was: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive), Peter Simons, 2005/01/28
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive,
Guido Draheim <=