discuss-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GNUstep article (was: Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits)


From: Dennis Leeuw
Subject: Re: GNUstep article (was: Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits)
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 23:44:47 +0200

If someone could send me a copy of the 'sources' of the pages I can see what
I can do.

Dennis

"M. Grabert" wrote:

> On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Dennis Leeuw wrote:
>
> > "Chris B. Vetter" wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 21 Jun 2001 22:24:37 +0200
> > > Björn Gohla <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > > well then, somebody knowledgeable will have to wave the flag and
> > > > write a good article, the aforementioned magazines regularly publish
> > > > outside contributions.
> > >
> > > How about a translation of Dennis' article on
> > >   http://lwn.net/daily/gnustep.php3 ?
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Gregory and I am writting a somewhat larger document about GNUstep, more
> > in the style of Apples Mac OS X System Overview. Maybe we could do a
> > pre-release so people could steal and rob and translate. Let me know if
> > people have a need for it.
> >
> > Dennis
>
> BTW, what about GNUstep man-pages ?
> People who want to programm GNUstep should have good manuals,
> and most people without OpenStep expirience don't have the
> OPENSTEP library ...
> Okay, this is something really time-wasting, and it has
> lower prioriy, but it's important to think about it!
>
> BTW,
> I think the OPENSTEP library was one of the best manual pages
> ever. Every single class was perfectly described and you could
> even get some hints how it was implemented (if you read it
> carefully).
> MFC docs are crap, MSDN is a little bit better.
> But even the MacOS X documentation is not that good anymore!
>
> sersn max

Attachment: dleeuw.vcf
Description: Card for Dennis Leeuw


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]