[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never).
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never). |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Apr 2004 10:30:11 +0900 (JST) |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.3 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
> Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
>> I still think this is a bad idea -- it cannot be done without
>> potentially
>> destabilizing the trunk which is currently in a very stable state, and
>> thus in a pretty unique state of "readiness for release".
>>
>> We could urge all the pretesters to try out the unicode branch now.
>> That way we would get a picture of how far it is from readiness.
> But the unicode branch is not synchronized with the trunk, so it wouldn't
> really tell us anything.
I'm gradually synchronizing unicode branch with the trunk by
the method Stephen taught me (i.e. moving
emacs-unicode-2-base tag), but the progress is slow.
> Even Handa-san says he is in favour of not merging unicode before we
> have made a major release from trunk.
Yes, but, what do you mean by "major release"? I thought
releasing from the trunk with the version number 21.5 (or
21.4) is a "minor release" because it changes only the minor
version.
---
Ken'ichi HANDA
address@hidden
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., (continued)
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/16
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Kenichi Handa, 2004/04/16
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/17
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Kenichi Handa, 2004/04/19
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/19
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Kenichi Handa, 2004/04/19
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Miles Bader, 2004/04/19
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Kenichi Handa, 2004/04/19
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/11
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Kim F. Storm, 2004/04/12
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never).,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Kim F. Storm, 2004/04/13
- Message not available
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Kim F. Storm, 2004/04/14
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Richard Stallman, 2004/04/14
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Kim F. Storm, 2004/04/14
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Lőrentey Károly, 2004/04/15
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Richard Stallman, 2004/04/16
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., David Kastrup, 2004/04/16
- Display-local settings (was: It is time for a feature freeze), Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/16
- Re: Display-local settings (was: It is time for a feature freeze), David Kastrup, 2004/04/16
- Re: Display-local settings (was: It is time for a feature freeze), Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/16