[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules
From: |
Elena Zannoni |
Subject: |
Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules |
Date: |
Tue, 3 Feb 2004 12:29:05 -0500 |
Jim Blandy writes:
> Elena Zannoni <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > [tirade deleted]
> >
> > and why oh why didn't you contact the steering committee instead of
> > organizing your cabal?
>
> At the time, the steering committee looked pretty stillborn, and as it
> hadn't been active in years, it wasn't clear what sort of authority it
> really had. We were going to float the proposal directly on gdb@, and
> put the issue in the hands of the people who worked on GDB day to day.
please don't reply privately.
I was able to contact the steering committee. I am 100% certain that
if you had chosen to do the same you would have succeeded.
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Richard Stallman, 2004/02/01
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Richard Stallman, 2004/02/01
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Robert Dewar, 2004/02/01
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Daniel Jacobowitz, 2004/02/02
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Michael Elizabeth Chastain, 2004/02/02
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Jim Blandy, 2004/02/03
- [Gdbheads] steering committee, David Carlton, 2004/02/03
- Re: [Gdbheads] steering committee, Elena Zannoni, 2004/02/03
- Re: [Gdbheads] steering committee, Michael Snyder, 2004/02/03
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Jim Blandy, 2004/02/03
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Andrew Cagney, 2004/02/03
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Michael Snyder, 2004/02/03