[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules
From: |
Jim Blandy |
Subject: |
Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules |
Date: |
03 Feb 2004 12:42:23 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 |
Elena Zannoni <address@hidden> writes:
> [tirade deleted]
>
> and why oh why didn't you contact the steering committee instead of
> organizing your cabal?
At the time, the steering committee looked pretty stillborn, and as it
hadn't been active in years, it wasn't clear what sort of authority it
really had. We were going to float the proposal directly on gdb@, and
put the issue in the hands of the people who worked on GDB day to day.
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, (continued)
- [Gdbheads] steering committee, David Carlton, 2004/02/03
- Re: [Gdbheads] steering committee, Elena Zannoni, 2004/02/03
- Re: [Gdbheads] steering committee, Michael Snyder, 2004/02/03
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules,
Jim Blandy <=
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Andrew Cagney, 2004/02/03
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Michael Snyder, 2004/02/03
Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Elena Zannoni, 2004/02/03
Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Ian Lance Taylor, 2004/02/04