[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gdbheads] Steering Committee nominations
From: |
Ian Lance Taylor |
Subject: |
Re: [Gdbheads] Steering Committee nominations |
Date: |
18 Feb 2004 09:01:55 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> IMVHO, we should try to exclude active GDB maintainers from the
> committee. Given the fallout from the incident(s) that led to these
> discussions, I think the committee's membership should be as remote
> as possible from any doubts regarding their objectivity; including
> people some of whom were involved in the kind of personal conflicts
> that led to this would go against that, IMHO.
I see where you are coming from, but I think that the steering
committee does need to have some people paying close attention to the
direction that the gdb source code is taking. I think it would be
hard to do that with no regular gdb maintainers at all.
I admit that I don't know how to reconcile the two positions.
Ian
- [Gdbheads] Steering Committee nominations, Benjamin Kosnik, 2004/02/17
- Re: [Gdbheads] Steering Committee nominations, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/18
- Re: [Gdbheads] Steering Committee nominations,
Ian Lance Taylor <=
- Re: [Gdbheads] Steering Committee nominations, Robert Dewar, 2004/02/18
- Re: [Gdbheads] Steering Committee nominations, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/19
- Re: [Gdbheads] Steering Committee nominations, Robert Dewar, 2004/02/19
- Re: [Gdbheads] Steering Committee nominations, Richard Stallman, 2004/02/20
- Re: [Gdbheads] Steering Committee nominations, Robert Dewar, 2004/02/20
- Message not available
- Re: [Gdbheads] Steering Committee nominations, Robert Dewar, 2004/02/20