[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gdbheads] Steering Committee nominations
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [Gdbheads] Steering Committee nominations |
Date: |
19 Feb 2004 08:58:22 +0200 |
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:56:25 -0500
> From: Robert Dewar <address@hidden>
>
> I would say that an obvious way to reconcile the two positions is
> to have some members but nowhere near all, be active GDB maintainers.
Do you have practical suggestions as to how we should decide which
active maintainers should be on the committee and which shouldn't?
Don't you see some problems potentially coming out of such selection
process, given the background of the current discussions?
- [Gdbheads] Steering Committee nominations, Benjamin Kosnik, 2004/02/17
- Re: [Gdbheads] Steering Committee nominations, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/18
- Re: [Gdbheads] Steering Committee nominations, Ian Lance Taylor, 2004/02/18
- Re: [Gdbheads] Steering Committee nominations, Robert Dewar, 2004/02/18
- Re: [Gdbheads] Steering Committee nominations,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: [Gdbheads] Steering Committee nominations, Robert Dewar, 2004/02/19
- Re: [Gdbheads] Steering Committee nominations, Richard Stallman, 2004/02/20
- Re: [Gdbheads] Steering Committee nominations, Robert Dewar, 2004/02/20
- Message not available
- Re: [Gdbheads] Steering Committee nominations, Robert Dewar, 2004/02/20
- Re: [Gdbheads] Steering Committee nominations, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/21
- Re: [Gdbheads] Steering Committee nominations, Michael Snyder, 2004/02/24
Re: [Gdbheads] Steering Committee nominations, David Carlton, 2004/02/18