[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] BK sync ?

From: Samium Gromoff
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] BK sync ?
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 16:30:46 +0400
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.11.3 (Wonderwall) SEMI/1.14.5 (Awara-Onsen) FLIM/1.14.5 (Demachiyanagi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)

At Wed, 17 Sep 2003 15:17:34 +0200,
Alexander Deruwe wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 02:08:32PM +0100, Paul Hedderly wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 03:01:59PM +0200, Alexander Deruwe wrote:
> > > I think this would require someone to buy a bk license.  The free
> > > license can't be used by people working on rev ctl systems.
> > 
> > That is definately a problem... but I think the restriction is on
> > people who contribute code to a completing RCS. So anyone who users
> > tla but hasn't contributed code is ok to use bk still. Well at the
> > moment.
> This is the relevant clause:
> (d)  Notwithstanding any other terms in this License, this
>      License is not available to You if  You  and/or  your
>      employer  develop,  produce,  sell,  and/or  resell a
>      product which contains substantially similar capabil-
>      ities  of  the BitKeeper Software, or, in the reason-
>      able opinion of BitMover, competes with the BitKeeper
>      Software.
> So it looks like you're right.  Someone wrote bk2svn too, I wonder what
> their relation to svn itself was..

 Hmm, so what about using bk2svn as the start, instead of bk?

> Alexander

regards, Samium Gromoff

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]