[Gnu-arch-users] Re: "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list

[Nikolai Weibull]

* Miles Bader <address@hidden> [Sep 27, 2004 19:51]:
> You (and jblack) should add a "Mail-Followup-To:" header, which many
> mailers will respect when doing "reply-to-all".  E.g.:

>    Mail-Followup-To: address@hidden

I thought that Mail-Followup-To wasn't part of any "standard" yet and
was frowned upon by many.  I know I've turned it of in mutt for some
reason I can't remember, but it was a good one I'm sure :-).

The best solution would be if everyone would just get a decent MUA,
learn how to use it-especially for dealing with mailing lists, and
then using the mailers reply-to-mailing-list function,
        nikolai

P.S.
Why does this list seem to add tabs in the subject line?  I'm guessing
this is due to some kind of mailing list header munging for wrapping
long header lines gone bad?
D.S.

--
::: name: Nikolai Weibull    :: aliases: pcp / lone-star / aka :::
::: born: Chicago, IL USA    :: loc atm: Gothenburg, Sweden    :::
::: page: www.pcppopper.org  :: fun atm: gf,lps,ruby,lisp,war3 :::
main(){printf(&linux["\021%six\012\0"],(linux)["have"]+"fun"-97);}