[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to l
From: |
Nikolai Weibull |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:58:06 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6i |
* Miles Bader <address@hidden> [Sep 28, 2004 09:50]:
> > > You (and jblack) should add a "Mail-Followup-To:" header, which
> > > many mailers will respect when doing "reply-to-all". E.g.:
> > > Mail-Followup-To: address@hidden
> > I thought that Mail-Followup-To wasn't part of any "standard" yet
> It's not as far as I know, but it's widely implemented, so it's pretty
> much a de-facto standard these days, especially among the more clueful
> MUAs out there like Gnus and Mutt (which I'm sure we all use :-).
Yep. Btw, guess where this mail wound up? That's right, straight in my
>-box, not in =lists.gnu-arch-users ;-).
> > and was frowned upon by many.
> I think this is not true. It's no doubt frowned upon by _some_, but
> largely it seems to be well-liked by the clueful.
OK.
> > Why does this list seem to add tabs in the subject line? I'm
> > guessing this is due to some kind of mailing list header munging for
> > wrapping long header lines gone bad?
>
> I guess because of the added "[gnu-arch-users] " tag (which I hate,
> but many people seem to love [presumably those who put all their mail
> in one huge folder]).
Yes, it's a really strange way of categorising email, that's for sure.
I strip it with .procmail:
MAILINGLISTTAGS="docbook|Epiphany|gentoo-announce|Gnu-arch-users|NTG-context|ruby-gnome2-devel-en|RP|STUMP"
:0 fw
* $^Subject: *(R[Ee]: )+\[(${MAILINGLISTTAGS})\] \/.*
| formail -bfI "Subject: Re: $MATCH"
:0 fw
* $^Subject: *\[(${MAILINGLISTTAGS})\] \/.*
| formail -bfI "Subject: $MATCH"
nikolai
--
::: name: Nikolai Weibull :: aliases: pcp / lone-star / aka :::
::: born: Chicago, IL USA :: loc atm: Gothenburg, Sweden :::
::: page: www.pcppopper.org :: fun atm: gf,lps,ruby,lisp,war3 :::
main(){printf(&linux["\021%six\012\0"],(linux)["have"]+"fun"-97);}
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, James Blackwell, 2004/09/27
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Miles Bader, 2004/09/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, James Blackwell, 2004/09/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Miles Bader, 2004/09/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, James Blackwell, 2004/09/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/09/27
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Nikolai Weibull, 2004/09/27
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Miles Bader, 2004/09/27
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list,
Nikolai Weibull <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2004/09/29
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, John Meinel, 2004/09/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Andrew Suffield, 2004/09/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, John Meinel, 2004/09/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Andrew Suffield, 2004/09/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Miles Bader, 2004/09/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, James Blackwell, 2004/09/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Matthieu Moy, 2004/09/27
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Nikolai Weibull, 2004/09/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, James Blackwell, 2004/09/27